By: Kiane
Just a note: “Why do pixel-pushers take a microscopic eye to the resolution of a sensor?” I think you mean the term “pixel-peepers”; pixel-pushers work in graphic design, right?
View ArticleBy: Evan
Hey Di — Nope. Never even been to the continent. Glad to hear I have goodwill down there though ;)
View ArticleBy: Evan
I think it’s an either/or situation, but I changed it because pixel-peepers probably is more accurate.
View ArticleBy: Evan
Hey Oren — I agree with everything you said. Because of that, I have nothing more to add :P
View ArticleBy: brett mayfield
“less than ideal tools” is completely contextual, as you stated in your original post. The “ideal tools” for for Peter Jackson are far different from Harmony Korine’s (when considering his feature...
View ArticleBy: Evan
Sure. Definitely. I agree 100%. My “less than ideal tools” argument extends mostly to extremes, as in your VHS example. You have to work harder and have a much better story to impress an audience these...
View ArticleBy: cbifilms
On thing you didn’t really mention is that this is not entirely new. Before digital, the arguments were mostly about film stocks instead of cameras, and the discussion was about dynamic range,...
View ArticleBy: Evan
Fewer choices and the technology didn’t move at nearly the same pace. It’s true there’s always been this type of back and forth, but it seems heightened now that the market has grown larger and more...
View ArticleBy: Evan
I think it’s an either/or situation, but I changed it because pixel-peepers probably is more accurate.
View ArticleBy: Evan
Hey Oren — I agree with everything you said. Because of that, I have nothing more to add :P
View ArticleBy: brett mayfield
“less than ideal tools” is completely contextual, as you stated in your original post. The “ideal tools” for for Peter Jackson are far different from Harmony Korine’s (when considering his feature...
View ArticleBy: Evan
Sure. Definitely. I agree 100%. My “less than ideal tools” argument extends mostly to extremes, as in your VHS example. You have to work harder and have a much better story to impress an audience these...
View ArticleBy: cbifilms
On thing you didn’t really mention is that this is not entirely new. Before digital, the arguments were mostly about film stocks instead of cameras, and the discussion was about dynamic range,...
View ArticleBy: Evan
Fewer choices and the technology didn’t move at nearly the same pace. It’s true there’s always been this type of back and forth, but it seems heightened now that the market has grown larger and more...
View ArticleBy: Lauren
I love that you wrote this. So much camera “information” out there seems so biased, based on what specs are important to someone, that it’s hard to actually feel like you’re making an informed choice....
View ArticleBy: Evan
Thanks for the comment Lauren. Agreed that it depends a lot on who is administering the tests or evaluating them. If you can find someone whom you agree with and trust, then it’s useful, but otherwise,...
View Article
